I forgot to tell you about a paper I’ll be delivering at the Association
The Internet is an undisputedly influential force in changes to the way entertainment is conceived, produced, distributed, experienced and critiqued. With the proliferation of technology we have a wide range of production devices and distribution models that, along with cultural and inter-disciplinary cross-fertilisation, inspire media-specific poetics and genre hybrids. To name a few that have emerged within new media arts alone: advertainment, email fiction, interactive comics, mobile art, hypertext fiction, wikifiction, botfiction and blog fiction. Conglomerate media ownership and franchise management encourages the shifting of audiences across platforms, within a branded universe. Years of television programming, competitive industry, networked markets and indie-publishing has facilitated episodic aesthetics and distribution. In the age of cross-media production, stories are no-longer delivered at a single-point in time; they are remediated, adapted, serialised, appropriated and distributed across media. Cross-media entertainment encompasses a range of genres that include pervasive gaming, franchises, alternate reality games, transmedia storytelling, mobisodes, episodic gaming, extendable reality games, tie-ins and so on.
The relationships between these ?texts?, between components of a storyworld, are not addressed in the notions of intertextuality, hypertextuality, dialogism and heteroglossia, assemblage, intermedia, open work and relational aesthetics. These works are emerging forms with poetic and cultural ramifications theorised by researchers in media studies, literary theory and semiotics: ?second-shift aesthetics? (Caldwell), ?digitextuality? (Everett), ?transmedia storytelling? (Jenkins), ?entertainment supersystem? (Kinder), ?transmedial worlds? (Klastrup and Tosca), ?inter-media world franchises? (Lemke), ?new intertextual commodity? (Marshall), ?neo-baroque aesthetics? (Ndalianis), ?distributed narratives? (Walker), ?networked narrative environments? (Zapp).
Sympathetic to Richard Wagner?s ?gesamtkunstwerk? (?total work of art?) these works are viewed through the romantic lens of Ionian Enchantment (Holton), universality (Andrews) and consilience (Wilson): they are reframed as polysystems within which a variety of clusters of entertainment forms co-exist and inter-relate. This is a somewhat turbulent narrative universe of original, commissioned, sanctioned and unsanctioned producers; long-form, short and micro narratives; linear, interactive, generated and emergent narratives; push and pull content; mono- and multi-modal media; fixed, mobile, converged, networked technology; public, private, mass, remote, virtual and personalised address; traditional, hybrid and emerging genres; literary, popular, marketing, anarchic and pedagogical rhetorics; fiction, nonfiction and alternate realities; real, virtual and augmented realities. How do audiences navigate such a dynamic narrative universe? The Internet.
This paper argues that the Internet is the binding agent of cross-media entertainment. A narrator with all the answers, a signpost to the everything, the Internet acts as site-map of continually updating components of a cross-media universe and its meta content. Rather than the artwork being the source of all information about a storyworld, the Internet acts as a neutral mediator of the various instantiations. Through a content analysis of cross-media productions and consideration of audience usage of media, an overview of the various functions the Internet currently plays, and could play are proposed.
When’s the full paper available?
I’d like to read it!
Hey Daphne! The paper won’t be available online until after the conference. But I’m sure I could send one your way earlier than that, as long as you cite me! 😉
Sounds great Christy and, once again, I’m working on a nearly identical project for a paper at the Digital Humanities conference in Paris this summer. I’m starting from Danielewski’s _House of Leaves_ and branching (no pun intended) out from there, finally arguing that the web is an integral assembly point for such projects. I’m also acutally trying to reformulate a theory of what “new” media actually is in this context– is it the digital/ electronic? Or the relationships engendered by exposure to digitization? Anyways, I’d love to read your paper. Any chance of an advance peek? (And, yes, of course I’ll cite you.)
I think it is a good sign that we’re resonating, because I really feel I’m on the right track and your presence on the path just confirms that for me. 🙂 And yes, I’ll forward the paper to you and Daphne. I’d appreciate your feedback. And too, let me know yours when it is ready!
Marc, I just realised too that I didn’t have your name mentioned in the abstract. But know, I’ll be mentioning you in my paper. 🙂
No worries about the abstract, Christy. And I totally agree with you– as spooky as it is sometimes with _how_ close and synchronous our thoughts are, it is reasssuring. Very much so.
And thanks for posting my LOST ramblings. Or does your sight do that for trackbacks automatically? Pretty cool if it does….
Wow. SITE. Your site.