<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing Entertainment: Integrate &#8217;06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universecreation101.com/2006/04/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universecreation101.com/2006/04/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/</link>
	<description>The creation of meaningful playful stories...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: christy</title>
		<link>http://www.universecreation101.com/2006/04/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>christy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/index.php/2006/04/22/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Leslie. I think it is bad news when studios stop inviting critics. Bascially, the industry has turned to being about the best marketing campaign, regardless of the content. But, it is an interesting point that they see kids at MySpace  as more important. The reason? Their sites have a high search ranking and they become citizen marketers, which makes a property seem a whole lot more credible (if &quot;normal people&quot; are championing it). But these citizen marketers aren&#039;t really marketing the film -- they haven&#039;t seen it! -- they&#039;re enjoying being part of the creation process. They get a buzz out of being the buzz too. Perhaps if the critics have a high profile on Technorati they&#039;d get invited? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Leslie. I think it is bad news when studios stop inviting critics. Bascially, the industry has turned to being about the best marketing campaign, regardless of the content. But, it is an interesting point that they see kids at MySpace  as more important. The reason? Their sites have a high search ranking and they become citizen marketers, which makes a property seem a whole lot more credible (if &#8220;normal people&#8221; are championing it). But these citizen marketers aren&#8217;t really marketing the film &#8212; they haven&#8217;t seen it! &#8212; they&#8217;re enjoying being part of the creation process. They get a buzz out of being the buzz too. Perhaps if the critics have a high profile on Technorati they&#8217;d get invited? <img src='http://www.universecreation101.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Nassar</title>
		<link>http://www.universecreation101.com/2006/04/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Nassar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/index.php/2006/04/22/marketing-entertainment-integrate-06/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0421/p15s01-almo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an article&lt;/a&gt; up on CSM about the studios restricting or outright refusing to provide advance screenings for critics because; &quot;The media world is changing, and &lt;b&gt;the people they want to reach are the kids who are looking at MySpace.com&lt;/b&gt; and exchanging instant messages about pictures aimed at them. &lt;b&gt;Conventional critics don&#039;t matter&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0421/p15s01-almo.html" rel="nofollow">an article</a> up on CSM about the studios restricting or outright refusing to provide advance screenings for critics because; &#8220;The media world is changing, and <b>the people they want to reach are the kids who are looking at MySpace.com</b> and exchanging instant messages about pictures aimed at them. <b>Conventional critics don&#8217;t matter</b>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

